- annamcmonigal
- Apr 1
- 4 min read
“The maple tree that Kate planted,” or “The maple tree, which Kate planted”? The use of that versus which and how to pair (or not pair) each with a comma is a common point of confusion in everyday writing. Since that and which are both relative pronouns used to join a relative clause (modifying a noun that precedes it) to an independent clause, they are often used interchangeably in error. The key to remembering the correct word choice is the following question: Is the relative clause you are working with essential or nonessential? That is used to introduce an essential clause, while which is exclusively for introducing clauses that are nonessential.
Let’s take a closer look at essential versus nonessential clauses. A clause is essential when removing it from a sentence would change its overall meaning.
Example: The bicycle that has training wheels is in the garage.
In this sentence, the relative clause that has training wheels (modifying the noun bicycle) is essential because removing it would change the overall meaning of the sentence, leaving the reader without clarification that the bicycle being referenced is the one with training wheels. Commas are not used to separate an essential clause because the writer needs that clause to formulate the core meaning of their sentence.
By contrast, a nonessential clause includes added detail about the noun (or noun phrase) being modified that is informative but not crucial to the sentence’s meaning. Let’s see how switching that to which in the sentence above changes the writer’s overall message.
Example: The bicycle, which has training wheels, is in the garage.
Whereas the use of that in the first version of the sentence emphasizes the importance of the training wheels, the second version—using which to introduce a relative clause separated by commas—indicates that the training wheels on the bicycle are a dispensable detail; therefore, there must only be one bicycle in the garage. As demonstrated here, using which is the proper way to introduce a nonessential clause.
Example: Emperor penguins, which live in Antarctica, have orange and yellow patches
on their heads.
Emperor penguins that live in Antarctica have orange and yellow patches
on their heads.
In the above example, changing which to that makes the second sentence inaccurate altogether. Since Emperor penguins only live in Antarctica, the first sentence properly separates this information in the form of a nonessential clause introduced by which and separated by commas. If this clause is removed, the meaning of the sentence remains intact, seeing as the habitat of these penguins is indisputable and needs no clarification. However, when that is used to create an essential clause, the writer indicates that only Emperor penguins living in Antarctica have orange and yellow markings, misleading the reader to believe there are Emperor penguins without this feature living elsewhere.
Example: The café in Midtown that is my favorite serves cocktails and tapas.
The café in Midtown, which is my favorite, serves cocktails and tapas.
Here, changing that to which alters the meaning of the sentence, once again. In the first sentence, the writer is comparing the café mentioned solely to other cafés in Midtown, whereas the second sentence compares the café in Midtown to all cafés in a broader category. Also, note that removing the nonessential clause which is my favorite still retains the writer’s core message about what is served at the café—whether or not the café is the writer’s favorite is irrelevant to their primary message.
What about who? Clauses beginning with who can be essential or nonessential, depending on the intent of the writer. Using commas properly here will provide your reader with the necessary clues to understand your message clearly.
Example: The professor who offers that course is currently on sabbatical.
The professor, who offers that course, is currently on sabbatical.
In this example, the first sentence aims to distinguish the professor mentioned from other professors by referring to the course they offer while using an essential clause without commas. Alternatively, the second sentence would be used in a context where the reader already knows the identity of the professor. The notice of the professor being on sabbatical is the main focus of this sentence, while the course they offer is a side detail separated by commas as a nonessential clause.
A common pitfall to avoid with the use of who to introduce a relative clause is substitution of that. When the noun being modified is a person rather than an object, the relative pronoun who is preferable to that.
Example: ✅ The professor who offers that course is currently on sabbatical.
⌧ The professor that offers that course is currently on sabbatical.
Additionally, make sure to check for proper use of who versus whom. Whom should be used specifically in contexts where the person being referenced is the object of the verb.
Example: ✅ The caterer who you met over the weekend just returned your call.
✅ The caterer whom you contacted just returned your call.
⌧ The caterer who you contacted just returned your call.
In summary, using a handy cheat sheet like the one below can help you make error-proof decisions about when to use commas with relative pronouns.
Thanks for reading! Continue to follow my blog for more advice on quelling comma drama!






